Farmer´s attitudes and farm management in small ruminant flocks with high brucellosis prevalence
PDF

Keywords

Multifactorial correspondence analysis
Brucellosis
Risk factor
Small ruminants
Vaccine Rev-1.

How to Cite

Coelho, A., García-Díez, J., Góis, J., Rodrigues, J., & Coelho, A. C. (2020). Farmer´s attitudes and farm management in small ruminant flocks with high brucellosis prevalence. Veterinaria Italiana, 55(4), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1162.6419.2

Abstract

The region of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro in northeast Portugal displayed the highest prevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants of the country. A vaccination programme of the whole population with Brucella melitensis Rev-1 was carried out from 2001 to 2004 in an attempt to reduce prevalence levels and protect public health. Although individual prevalence decreased from 5.6% in 2001 to 0.4% in 2007, several flocks continued to present individual prevalence ≥ 5.0%. Given the multifactorial characteristics of brucellosis, the current study evaluated farming practices and risk factors in flocks with an individual prevalence over 5% by multifactorial correspondence analysis. Results showed that a lack of recognition of the symptoms of brucellosis and lack of Rev-1 vaccination were the main factors contributing to the high individual prevalence of brucellosis in flocks. Other factors such as the consumption of raw milk, presence of dog commingling with animals and use of communal pastures also contributed to the persistence of the disease. Family farms with low economical profit, minimal training/education of farmers, and a scarcity of veterinary support may explain the persistence of factors contributing to the high prevalence of brucellosis. The results of this study highlight several risk factors and farming practices that might have contributed to the maintenance of a high prevalence of brucellosis in flocks with high brucellosis prevalence. These results could be used to adopt new approaches to improve the efficiency of brucellosis eradication programs.
https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1162.6419.2
PDF

References

Aguiar D.M., Cavalcante G.T., Labruna M.B., Vasconcellos S.A., Rodrigues A.A.R., Morais Z.M., Camargo L.M.A. & Gennari S.M. 2007. Risk factors and seroprevalence of Brucella spp. in cattle from western Amazon, Brazil. Arq Ins Biologico, Sao Paulo, 74, 301-305.

Baek B.K., Lim C.W., Rahman M.S., Kim C.H., Oluoch A. & Kakoma I. 2003. Brucella abortus infection in indigenous Korean dogs. Can J Vet Res, 67, 312-314.Blasco J.M. 1997. A review of the use of B. melitensisRev 1 vaccine in adult sheep and goats. Prev Vet Med, 31, 275-283.

Blasco J.M. 2002. Estrategias de control. Vacunas actuales y de nueva generación. Ovis, 82, 87-101Blasco J.M. 2006. Existing and future vaccines against brucellosis in small ruminants. Small Rumin Res, 62, 33-37.

Center for Food Security and Public Health (CFSPH). 2009. Brucellosis. www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/brucellosis.pdf.

Coelho A.M., Coelho A.C., Roboredo M. & Rodrigues J. 2007. A case-control study of risk factors for brucellosis seropositivity in Portuguese small ruminants herds. Prev Vet Med, 82, 291-301

Direcção Geral de Veterinária (DGV). 2011. Brucelose dos pequenos ruminantes Programa de Erradicação para o ano 2012. Lisboa.

Direcção Geral de Veterinária (DGV). 2013. Programa Especial de Erradicação da Brucelose dos Pequenos Ruminantes na Região de Trás-os-Montes. Lisboa.

Direcção Geral de Veterinária (DGV). 2014. Direção Geral de Saúde. Doenças de Declaração obrigatória. Lisboa.

Council Directive 91/68/EEC of 28 January 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in ovine and caprine animals. OJ, L 46, 19.02.1991, 19-36.

Ganter M. 2008. Veterinary consultancy and health schemes in sheep: Experiences and reflections from a local German outlook. Small Rumin Res, 76, 55-67.

Garcia-Díez J. & Coelho A.C. 2013. An evaluation of cattle farmers’ knowledge of bovine brucellosis in northeast Portugal. J Infec Public Health, 6, 363-369

Gunn G.J., Heffernan C., Hall M., McLeod A. & Hovi M. 2008. Measuring and comparing constraints to improvedbiosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. Prev Vet Med, 84, 310-323.

Lithg-Pereira P.L., Mainar-Jaime R.C., Álvarez-Sánchez M.A. & Rojo-Vázquez F.A. 2001. Evaluation of official eradication-campaigns data for investigating small-ruminant brucellosis in the province of León, Spain. Prev Vet Med, 51, 215-225.

Mainar-Jaime R.C. & Vázquez-Boland J.A. 1999. Associations of veterinary services and farmer characteristics with the prevalence of brucellosis and border disease in small ruminants in Spain. Prev Vet Med, 40, 193-205.

Minas A., Minas M., Stournara A. & Tselepidis S. 2004. The “effects” of Rev.-1 vaccination of sheep and goats on human brucellosis in Greece. Prev Vet Med, 64, 41-47.

Minas A. 2006. Control and eradication of brucellosis in small ruminants. Small Rumin Res, 62, 101-107 Portugal.

Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas. 2000. Decreto-lei 244/2000. https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/561379/details/maximized.Portugal.

Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas. 2006. Decreto-Lei 142/2006. https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/539227/details/normal?l=1.

Radostits O.M., Gay C.C., Blood D. & Hinchcliff K.W. 2000. Medicina Veterinaria - Tratado de enfermedades del ganado bovino,ovino, porcino, caprino y equino. 9th Ed. Madrid, McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Reviriego F.J., Moreno M.A. & Domínguez L. 2000. Risk factors for brucellosis seroprevalence of sheep and goat flocks in Spain. Prev Vet Med, 44, 167-173.

Seleem M.N., Boyle S.M. & Sriranganathan N. 2010. Brucellosis: a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Microbiol, 140, 392-398.

Sofian M., Aghakhani A., Velayati A.A., Banifazl M., Eslamifar A. & Ramezani A. 2008. Risk factors for human brucellosis in Iran: a case-control study. Int J Infect Dis, 12, 157-161.

Torres A. & Van de Velden M. 2007. Perceptual mapping of multiple variable batteries by plotting supplementary variables in correspondence analysis of rating data. Food Qual Prefer, 18, 21-129.