1
Evaluation of ELISA in raw milk for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy herd
PDF

Keywords

Bulk tank milk
ELISA
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratubercolosis
Milk
Paratubercolosis

How to Cite

Tieri, S., Cirone, K., Morsella, C., Méndez, L., Mundo, S., Fernández, B., & Paolicchi, F. (2024). Evaluation of ELISA in raw milk for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy herd. Veterinaria Italiana, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.2948.18971.1

Abstract

Paratuberculosis (PTBC) is a chronic intestinal disease of animals caused by Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (MAP). MAP infection is diagnosed through indirect tests based on the immune response. The aims of this study were to compare the performance of two milk ELISA for the diagnosis of PTBC and to assess the bulk tank milk (BTM) MAP exposure in dairy cattle in Argentina. A total of 357 fecal, serum, and milk samples were collected. The fecal samples were processed by culture for MAP isolation, while both, serum and milk samples were used for the detection of antibodies by two different ELISA tests, "in-house" and commercial kit. MAP was isolated in 3.9% of fecal samples. For milk ELISA, poor concordances were obtained. Optimized cut-off points were calculated. The highest sensitivity and specificity values (64% and 80% respectively) were obtained with the combination of MAP isolation and commercial milk ELISA. The results indicate that the combination of different techniques to identify of dairy cattle infected with MAP increases the efficiency of diagnosis. In addition, BTM  samples (n=98) were evaluated to determine herd status using the commercial kit during two seasons, identifying 33.3% of positive samples in autumn and 35.4% in spring.

https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.2948.18971.1
PDF

References

Arsenault R.J., Maattanen P., Daigle J., Potter A., Griebel P. & Napper S. 2014. From mouth to macrophage: mechanisms of innate immune subversion by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet Res, 45, 54.

Ayele W., Macháčková M. & Pavlik I. 2001. The transmission and impact of paratuberculosis infection in domestic and wild ruminants. Vet Med Czech, 46, 205-224.

Cirone, K. 2015. Identificación y caracterización bacteriológica y molecular de cepas de Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis en productos lácteos y agua. Thesis, University National of Mar del Plata, Argentina, 127 pp.

Collins M. & Morgan I. 1991. Epidemiological model of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Prev Vet Med, 11,131-146.

Corbett C.S., Naqvi A.S., Bauman C.A., De Buck J., Orsel K., Uehlinger F., Kelton D.F. & Barkema H.W. 2018. Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infections in Canadian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci, 101, 11218-11228.

Eda S., Bannantine J.P., Waters W.R., Mori Y., Whitlock R.H., Scott M.C. & Speer C.A. 2006. A Highly sensitive and subspecies-specific surface antigen Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for diagnosis of Johne’s disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 13, 837-844.

Garcia A.B. & Shalloo L. 2015. Invited review: The economic impact and control of paratuberculosis in cattle. J Dairy Sci, 98, 5019-5039.

Gilardoni L., Paolicchi F. & Mundo S.L. 2012. Bovine paratuberculosis: a review of advantages and disadvantages of the different diagnostic tests. Rev Argent Microbiol, 44, 201-215.

Grant I. 2005. Zoonotic potential of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: the current position. J Appl Microbiol, 98, 1282-1293.

Green G., Tizard M., Thompson J., Winterbourne D., Mc Fadden J. & Hermon-Taylor J. 1989. Sequence and characteristic of IS900, and insertion sequence identified in human Crohn’s disease isolate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Nucleic acids Res, 17, 9063-9073.

Gwet K.L. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 4th. ed. (K.L. Gwet, ed). Advanced Analytics, Gaithersburg, 38 p.

Hendrick S.H., Kelton D.F., Leslie K., Lissemore K.D., Archambault M. & Duffield T.F. 2005. Effect of paratuberculosis on culling, milk production, and milk quality in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med, 227, 1302-1308.

Keller S.M., Stephan R., Kuenzler R., Meylan M. & Wittenbrink M.M. 2014. Comparison of fecal culture and F57 real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss cattle herds with a history of paratuberculosis. Acta Vet Scand, 56, 58.

Khare S., Garry Adams L., Osterstock J., Roussel A. & David L. 2008. Effects of shipping and storage conditions of fecal samples on viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol, 46, 1561-1562.

Landis J. & Koch G. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 159‐174.

Lombard J.E., Byrem T.M., Wagner B.A. & Mccluskey B.J. 2006. Comparison of milk and serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in dairy cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest, 18, 448-458.

Mason O., Rowe M.T. & Ball H.J. 1997. Is Mycobacterium paratuberculosis a possible agent in Crohn´s disease? Implications for the dairy industry. Milchwissenschaft, 52, 311-316.

McAloon C.G., Whyte P., More S.J., Green M.J., O'grady L., Garcia A.B. & Michael L.D. 2016. The effect of paratuberculosis on milk yield. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci, 99, 1449-1460.

McKenna S., Barkema H., Keefe G. & Sockett D. 2006. Agreement between three ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Microbiol, 114, 285‐291.

Mikkelsen H., Aagaard C., Nielsen S.S. & Jungersen G. 2011. Review of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigen candidates with diagnostic potential. Vet Microbiol, 152, 1-20.

Mortier R.A.R., Barkema H.W. & De Buck J. 2015. Susceptibility to and diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in dairy calves: A review. Prev Vet Med, 121, 189-198.

Nielsen S.S & Toft N. 2008. Ante mortem diagnosis of paratuberculosis: a review of accuracies of ELISA, interferon-gamma assay and faecal culture techniques. Vet Microbiol, 129, 217-235.

Nielsen S.S., Enevoldsen C. & Grohn Y.T. 2002. The Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis ELISA response by parity and stage of lactation. Prev Vet Med, 54, 1-10.

Nielsen S.S., Thamsborg S.M., Houe H. & Bitsch V. 2000. Bulk tank milk ELISA antibodies for estimating the prevalence of paratuberculosis in Danish dairy herds. Prev Vet Med, 44, 1-7.

Paolicchi F., Zumárraga M., Giofré A., Zamorano P., Morsella C., Verna A., Cataldi A., Alito A. & Romano M. 2003. Application of different methods for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds in Argentina. J Vet Med, 50, 20-26.

Paolicchi F.A. & Romano M.I. 2007. Paratuberculosis. In Microbiología Veterinaria, 2010 Ed. (N.O. Stanchi, editor). Intermédica, Buenos Aires, 307-312.

Paolicchi, F. 2004. Paratuberculosis: Aspectos clínico patológicos y su impacto en la producción (Parte 1). In XXXII Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría. (M. Rodríguez & J. Gil, eds). XXXII Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría, Paysandú, 10-12 June 2004. Centro médico veterinario de Paysandú, 127-143.

Pesqueira M.N., Yus E., Factor C., Mato I., Sanjuán M.I., Eiras C., Arnaiz I. & Diéguez F.J. 2017. Short communication: Correlation between within-herd antibody prevalence and bulk tank milk antibody levels to Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis using 2 commercial immunoassays. J Dairy Sci, 100, 7544-7548.

Ponnusamy D., Periasamy S., Tripathi B. & Pal A. 2013. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis invades through M cells and enterocytes across ileal and jejunal mucosa of lambs. Res Vet Sci, 94, 306-312.

Richardson E. & More S.J. 2009. Direct and indirect effects of Johne’s disease on farm and animal productivity in an Irish dairy herd. Ir Vet J, 62, 526-32.

Schoonjans F., Zalata A., Depuydt C.E. & Comhaire F.H. 1995. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 48, 257-262.

Scott M.C., Bannantine J.P., Kaneko Y., Branscum A.J., Whitlock R.H., Mori Y., Speer C.A. & Eda S. 2010. Absorbed EVELISA: A diagnostic test with improved specificity for Johne’s disease in cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 7, 1291-1296.

Speer C.A., Scott M.C., Bannantine J.P., Waters W.R., Mori Y., Whitlock R.H. & Eda S. 2006. A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infections (Johne's disease) in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 13, 535-540.

Sweeney R.W., Collins M.T., Koets A.P., Mc Guirk S.M. & Roussel A.J. 2012. Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in cattle and other susceptible species. J Vet Intern Med, 26, 1239-1250.

Van Weering H., Van Schaik G., Van Der Meulen A., Waal M., Franken P. & Van Maanen K. 2007. Diagnostic performance of the Pourquier ELISA for detection of antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in individual milk and bulk milk samples of dairy herds. Vet Microbiol, 125, 49-58.

Vasini Rosell B., Lagleyze B., Morsella C., Méndez L., Bresky F., Gioffré A. & Paolicchi F.A. 2020. Evidence of in utero infection by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis using Multiple-Locus Variable-number tandem-repeat Analysis. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci, 57, e161653.

Wilson D.J., Rood K., Biswas P. & Byrem M. 2010. Herd-level prevalence of Johne’s disease in Utah and adjacent areas of the Intermountain West as detected by a bulk-tank milk surveillance project. J Dairy Sci, 93, 5792-5797.

Copyright (c) 2024 Silvina Tieri, Karina Cirone, Claudia Morsella, Laura Méndez, Silvia Mundo, Bárbara Fernández, Fernando Paolicchi