Genotyping and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella strains collected from sheep and cattle samples in Algeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.3609.32058.2Keywords:
Meat, Salmonella, genetic profiling, antibiotic resistance, public healthAbstract
The present work investigates the genetic relatedness and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella strains collected from the red meat supply chain, highlighting the public health significance of these pathogens. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE-XbaI) was applied to genotype a collection of 84 Salmonella strains isolated from slaughterhouses. The antibiotic susceptibility of these strains to fourteen antimicrobial agents was determined using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method.
The isolates were classified into 22 fingerprints, with two strains being non-typable. The predominant PFGE types identified were Mu1 (n=18), I2 (n=10), and K2 (n=8), indicating a high level of genetic similarity among isolates (>80%). All Salmonella strains exhibited resistance to at least two antimicrobials, with approximately 34.5% displaying resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics. Twelve distinct resistant patterns were identified, and notably, only one colistin-resistant Salmonella strain was detected. These findings underscore the need for ongoing surveillance and control measures in the red meat industry.
Introduction
Public awareness about food safety has significantly surged due to the rising number and severity of foodborne illnesses on a global scale. Salmonella is one of the main pathogens responsible for foodborne illnesses. Each year, a total of 93.8 million cases of gastroenteritis caused by Salmonella species worldwide, resulting in 155,000 deaths (Rincón-Gamboa et al., 2021). Salmonella's ability to cause disease is linked to various virulence genes located in its chromosome or large virulence-related plasmids. These genes encode products that facilitate interactions with host organisms during key stages such as colonisation, invasion, intracellular replication, and tissue damage (Nouichi et al., 2023). The primary sources of human Salmonella infections are often linked to contaminated animal-derived food products like meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products (Fatima et al., 2023). Meat can be contaminated at multiple stages of the supply chain, particularly in abattoirs during evisceration and intestinal content removal, mainly due to cross-contamination from equipment, utensils, and personnel (Cetin et al., 2020; Rincón-Gamboa et al., 2021). In Algeria, various studies have indicated that Salmonella is present in meat products, leading to greater exposure of the population to this pathogenic bacterium (Djeffal et al., 2018; Nouichi et al., 2018; Mezali et al., 2019). This necessitates a thorough investigation into the genetic diversity of these strains.
Typing of foodborne pathogens like Salmonella through molecular genotyping is essential for identifying specific strains responsible for outbreaks and detecting emerging health threats (Ed-Dra et al., 2018). Understanding the genetic relatedness among Salmonella isolates can provide insights into transmission pathways and outbreak dynamics. Although Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) has recently emerged as a more advanced and precise technique for genomic characterization, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) remains a valuable and widely used tool, particularly in settings where WGS is not feasible due to resource constraints. PFGE continues to serve as a standard method for genotyping, especially in outbreak investigations and source tracking by public health authorities (Turky et al., 2014). In addition, the rising resistance of Salmonella to one or more antimicrobial agents, driven by the uncontrolled use of these substances in production systems for preventing and treating infectious diseases, presents a significant public health challenge (Rincón-Gamboa et al., 2021). Many strains have shown resistance to commonly used antibiotics, including tetracyclines, sulphonamides, and ampicillin, which complicates treatment options for infected individuals (Mthembu et al., 2019; Cetin et al., 2020). The emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains, particularly those associated with food products, raises concerns about the effectiveness of existing therapeutic strategies (Fatima et al., 2023) and underscores the need for continuous monitoring of resistance patterns.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic diversity of 84 Salmonella enterica strains isolated from red meats in Algeria, focusing on determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antibiotics and using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the restriction enzyme XbaI for genotyping.
Materials and methods
Bacterial isolates
The 84 analysed Salmonella strains were recovered during a previous study (Nouichi et al., 2018) from 826 samples (350 from cattle and 476 from sheep) collected from red meat abattoirs in Algiers. These strains were originally isolated from cattle carcasses (n= 39), sheep carcasses (n= 32), cattle faeces (n= 11) and sheep faeces (n=2). All Salmonella strains were performed according to the International Organisation of Standardisation method (ISO 6579), serotyped by slide agglutination as specified by the White- Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme, and confirmed by PCR technique using the Salmonella-specific invA gene (284 bp).
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
All Salmonella isolates were further characterised for antimicrobial susceptibility using the Sensititre broth microdilution assay with EUVSEC plates (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, USA). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for each of the following 14 antimicrobials with tested concentration range (μg/ml) in brackets: ampicillin (1–64), azithromycin (2–64), cefotaxime (0.25–4), ceftazidime (0.5–8), chloramphenicol (8–128), ciprofloxacin (0.015–8), colistin (1–16), gentamicin (0.5–32), meropenem (0.03–16), nalidixic acid (4–128), sulfamethoxazole (8–1024), tetracycline (2–64), tigecycline (0.25–8) and trimethoprim (0.25–32). The tests were performed according to the manufacturer guidelines. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain. Clinical breakpoint values from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, 2023) were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. For each antibiotic, the MIC50 and MIC90 were calculated as the minimum concentrations that inhibited the growth of the isolates by 50% and 90% respectively.
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) Analyses
Clonal relatedness among the strains was carried out using PFGE according to the standardized CDC PulseNet protocol. Briefly, bacterial suspensions of Salmonella isolates were prepared from fresh overnight cultures and fixed in agarose plugs. Then, agarose-embedded genomic DNA was subjected to digestion with application of XbaI restriction enzyme (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The generated fragments were separated in 1% agarose using Chef Mapper (CHEF DR III PFGE, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 DNA was used as a molecular size marker. A dendrogram was developed according to the Dice similarity coefficient by employing the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) using GelCompar II software v. 6.6 (Applied Maths, SintMartems-Latem, Belgium) with a position tolerance of 1.4%.
Results
Antimicrobial resistance rates within each Salmonella serovar against the 14 antimicrobial agents tested are shown in Table I and the MIC distributions for the different antibiotics are shown in Table II. All the Salmonella isolates tested were found to be susceptible to meropenem, azithromycin, cefotaxime, tigecycline and ceftazidime. The highest resistance was observed in sulphonamides (100%) with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) reaching 1024 μg/mL for all isolates, indicating a total ineffectiveness of this antibiotic. Similarly, widespread resistance was noted for diaminopyrimidines, with MIC values of 32 μg/mL.
Regarding quinolones, including nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, , there is a wide variation in minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) across strains, with some displaying resistance levels of up to 8 μg/mL. Overall, the resistance rates for these quinolones range from 28.6% to 30.9%, it is particularly troubling that S. Kentucky shows 100% resistance to both antibiotics. Resistance rates were 21% for gentamicin, and 20% for tetracycline with MIC values reaching 32 μg/mL and 64 μg/ mL, respectively. In contrast, our isolates exhibited low levels of resistance to colistin (1.2%) and chloramphenicol (3.6%).
All of the Salmonella isolates exhibited resistance to two or more antimicrobial agents used. Twenty-nine isolates (34.5%) belonging to 8 serovars were multidrug-resistant, being resistant to at least three different classes of antimicrobials. Eighty strains (21.4%) were resistant to 7 antibiotics. All multidrug resistant (MDR) strains were originated from carcasses without regard to the animal species and the slaughterhouses. Furthermore, twelve resistant phenotypes, i.e. RI–RXII, were defined (Table III). The two most dominant resistant phenotypes were RI and RXI, represented by 55 and 17 strains, respectively. The remaining phenotypes were represented by one or two strains.
Sulfamethoxazole showed the highest MIC50 and MIC90 values (>1024 µg/ml). Trimethoprim yielded MIC50 and MIC90 values >32 µg/ml. High values of MIC90 were found with tetracycline, Nalidixic acid, ampicillin and gentamicin The MIC50 and MIC90 values were less than the resistance breakpoint of azithromycin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol and tigecycline.
PFGE analysis produced multiple patterns consisting of several fragments ranging in size from 40 to 1100 kb. PFGE of XbaI-digested genomic DNA from 82 Salmonella isolates showed 22 different macro-restriction profiles or clusters (Figure 1), while the remaining 2 isolates were unclustered.
The distribution of different genotypes according to the sampling source in each of the two slaughterhouses is detailed in Table IV.
Table. I. Antibiotic resistance rates of Salmonella strains by serovar: SMX: sulfamethoxazole; TMP: trimethoprim; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TET: tetracycline; MERO: meropenem; AZI: azithromycin; NAL: nalidixic acid; FOT: cefotaxime; CHL: chloramphenicol; TGC: tigecycline; TAZ: ceftazidime; COL: colistin; AMP: ampicillin; GEN: gentamicin.
Table. II. Distribution of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for the 84 tested Salmonella isolates: SMX: sulfamethoxazole; TMP: trimethoprim; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TET: tetracycline; MERO: meropenem; AZI: azithromycin; NAL: nalidixic acid; FOT: cefotaxime; CHL: chloramphenicol; TGC: tigecycline; TAZ: ceftazidime; COL: colistin; AMP: ampicillin; GEN: gentamicin.
Table. III. Resistance pattern profiles of the studied Salmonella strains: C: carcasses; F: Faeces; SMX: sulfamethoxazole; TMP: trimethoprim; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TET: tetracycline; MERO: meropenem; AZI: azithromycin; NAL: nalidixic acid; FOT: cefotaxime; CHL: chloramphenicol; TGC: tigecycline; TAZ: ceftazidime; COL: colistin; AMP: ampicillin; GEN: gentamicin.
Table. <strong> </strong>IV.<strong> </strong>Genotyping<strong> </strong>results<strong> </strong>of<strong> </strong><em>Salmonella</em><strong> </strong>strains<strong> </strong>via<strong> </strong>PFGE<strong> </strong>according<strong> </strong>to<strong> </strong>the<strong> </strong>sample<strong> </strong>source.
Figure. <strong> </strong>1.<strong> </strong>PFGE<strong> </strong>patterns<strong> </strong>and<strong> </strong>dendrogram<strong> </strong>analysis<strong> </strong>of<strong> </strong>XbaI<strong> </strong>digested<strong> </strong>genomic<strong> </strong>DNA<strong> </strong>from<strong> </strong>of<strong> </strong>the<strong> </strong>84<strong> </strong>studied<strong> </strong><em>Salmonella</em><strong> </strong>strains.
Similarity coefficient
Dice
Optimization: 0 %
Tolerance: 1 %
Tolerance change: 0 %
Minimum height: 0 %
Minimum surface: 0 %
Uncertain bands: Ignore
Relaxed doublet matching: No
Fuzzy logic: No
Area sensitive: No
Cluster analysis
Clustering method: UPGMA
Use advanced clustering: No
Branch quality: Cophenetic correlation
Discussion
The increasing prevalence of Salmonella spp. strains that have developed resistance to multiple antibiotic families can be attributed to the excessive and improper utilisation of antibiotics in human and veterinary healthcare for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. Additionally, the systematic inclusion of antibiotics in animal feed to promote growth and enhance yield further contributes to this phenomenon. This overuse and misuse of antibiotics have resulted in the transmission of drug-resistant Salmonella to humans through the food chain, posing a potential threat to human health (Fatima et al., 2023).
None of the Salmonella strains were sensitive to all the antibiotics tested in this study. Resistance to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim was common (100%), while 20% of the isolates were found to be resistant to tetracyclines with especially high rates in S. Kentucky. These findings contrast with those of Elki et al. (2019), who reported complete sensitivity of Salmonella isolates from meat in Ghana to the same antibiotics.
These molecules are older first-line molecules widely used in livestock farming. They are the most accessible classes of antibiotics, making them attractive to developing countries with limited healthcare budgets. Resistance to these drugs is generally due to a plasmid gene that can be easily acquired by bacteria.
Regarding chloramphenicol, resistance rates of 3.6% were found. This result could be explained by the moderate use of these drugs due to their withdrawal from the Algerian nomenclature.
A quarter (25%) of the isolated strains exhibited resistance to gentamicin, a prominent antibiotic used in urinary tract infections treatment in humans.
Although colistin demonstrates a low resistance rate (1.2%), the crucial role of polymyxins as a last resort for treating multidrug-resistant infections, particularly in the context of limited viable therapeutic alternatives (Marchant et al., 2024), makes this finding significant. Our previous study (Nouichi et al., 2018) did not identify any resistance to this molecule. This prior research was based on the disk diffusion test, which is not appropriate for detecting colistin resistance (Bertelloni et al., 2022). Furthermore, until 2015, colistin resistance mechanisms were known to be encoded in the chromosome. However, the subsequent identification of a colistin resistance gene (mcr-1) in a conjugative plasmid in Escherichia coli isolates of animal origin raised significant concern within the scientific community (Lima et al., 2019). Supporting these concerns, Gutema et al. (2021) also reported colistin resistance in two strains of Salmonella isolated from cattle in slaughterhouses in Ethiopia. Notably, the resistance was observed in the Dublin serovar, while in our study, it was detected in the Richmond serovar. This underscores the need for continued surveillance and stringent antimicrobial stewardship.
Conversely, resistance to β-lactams was limited to ampicillin (29.8%), previous studies from different countries have reported higher resistance rates (Sallam et al., 2014; Moawad et al., 2017, Pławińska-Czarnak et al., 2022; Tadesse et al., 2024). On the other hand, the absence of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is a positive aspect, as they are clinically essential in the treatment of invasive salmonellosis in humans. Moreover, tigecycline, a new class of glycylcyclines, showed good activity against Salmonella. It is known to exhibit broad-spectrum activity against most Enterobacteriaceae bacteria. Tigecycline's effectiveness against Salmonella is further supported by Gutema et al. (2021), who found no resistance to the drug in Salmonella strains isolated from cattle in Ethiopia.
However, all S. Kentucky and S. Typhimurium isolates were found to be resistant to ciprofloxacin. This could be attributed to the uncontrolled use of these expensive drugs in livestock farming in Algeria. Salmonella that are resistant to fluoroquinolones are included in the World Health Organization's high-priority list (Mthembu et al., 2019). This poses a significant concern due to the rapid development of bacterial resistance to newly discovered antibiotics. Resistance to ciprofloxacin has been reported in Salmonella isolates from food across several African countries, including Tunisia (Oueslati et al., 2021; Hassena et al., 2022), Morocco (El Hanafi et al., 2023; Sabri et al., 2023), Egypt (Abd-Elghany et al., 2022), Nigeria (Beshiru et al., 2019), Ghana (Adzitey et al., 2015) and Ethiopia (Wabeto et al., 2017; Eguale, 2018; Mustefa et al., 2018). A different study, however, reported no resistance to ciprofloxacin in Kentucky and Typhimurium serovars isolated from raw chicken and beef meat in northern Egypt (Moawad et al., 2017).
In addition to ciprofloxacin, resistance of these strains to quinolones also involved the nalidixic acid. Complete resistance to quinolones is achieved only when two or more mutations in the gyrA gene, which encodes the targets of these drugs, are present simultaneously (Mthembu et al., 2019). It appears that the isolates tested in this study have undergone this type of mutation, as they are resistant to nalidixic acid and other quinolone molecules such as ciprofloxacin.
In this study, 12 distinct multidrug resistance patterns were recorded. The two serovars commonly involved in collective foodborne illnesses, S. Kentucky and S. Typhimurium, had the highest number of multidrug-resistant phenotypes. This aligns with multiple recent studies that have documented the global occurrence of MDR Salmonella in raw meat worldwide (Moawad et al., 2017, Cetin et al., 2020; Gutema et al., 2021; Rincón-Gamboa et al., 2021; Fatima et al., 2023). Multidrug resistance defined as resistance to at least three classes of antimicrobial agents to antibiotics, may result from the transfer of resistance genes and random chromosomal mutations (Mthembu et al., 2019). Multidrug-resistant strains are associated with a high risk of invasive infections and mortality compared to sensitive strains (Mouttotou et al., 2017).
However, it is important to note that the Salmonella strains obtained from faeces exhibited resistance solely to trimethoprim and sulphonamides. This observation can be attributed to the possibility that the elevated quantity of Salmonella found in carcasses during this study is not predominantly linked to the presence of the bacteria in faeces.
In this study, the PFGE analysis of the 84 Salmonella strains revealed 22 distinct genotypes. Two non-typable strains belonging to serovar S. Muenster were observed, possibly due to DNA degradation during the addition of endonuclease buffer as reported by Turky et al. (2014). The high clonality observed, above 80%, suggests limited genetic variation between the different patterns.
The study revealed the prevalence of genotype Mu1, representing 21.42% of the isolated Salmonella strains. These strains were mainly recovered from El-Harrach slaughterhouse and exhibited similar antibiotic resistance profiles. Genotype I1, representing 14.28% of the strains, was also isolated from El-Harrach slaughterhouse. These two clones persisted for a long period, suggesting adaptation to the environment of livestock in that slaughterhouse. Some clones were specific to certain slaughterhouses, such as clone K1 in El-Harrach slaughterhouse and K2 in Hussein-Dey slaughterhouse. This could be attributed to the presence of persistent clones in each slaughterhouse. Some genetic profiles were present in both slaughterhouses, which could be attributed to the movement of animals through commercial circuits.
Three strains of S. Havana were isolated from both slaughterhouses, suggesting possible clone persistence in the wilaya of Algiers or a common origin of the slaughtered animals. Some genetic profiles were ubiquitous on carcasses and animal faeces, indicating cross-contamination through equipment, operator hands, and the environment. Certain serovars, such as S. Infantis, showed high genetic similarity, suggesting clonal persistence in the environment of El-Harrach slaughterhouse. This is consistent with the study by Ed-Dra et al. (2018), which showed that all 21 strains of S. Infantis isolated from beef belonged to a single fingerprint. Other studies have also reported high similarity of S. Infantis in animal and human isolates (Hauser et al., 2012; Rahmani et al., 2013; Velhner et al., 2014; Franco et al., 2015). The Salmonella strains exhibited evident genetic diversity, with frequent changes in clones during different sampling visits. Each group of animals introduced new clonal types of Salmonella, indicating that each batch of animals could potentially contaminate other carcasses.
Salmonella Muenster was the most diverse serovar, with five distinct genotypes. The genetic variability among strains could be due to the presence of linear plasmids and transposons (Karatuğ et al., 2018). The study did not show a seasonal effect for certain Salmonella genotypes. The reasons for the high genetic similarity of the strains require further research. Nationwide sample collection would provide a broader understanding of Salmonella serovars in ovine and bovine farms.
Conclusion
In summary, these results demonstrate the clonality of some serotypes, confirming the spread and persistence of the same clone in the studied establishments. Conversely, the heterogeneity of the profiles of other serotypes suggests a possible diversity of sources of contamination in these two slaughterhouses.
On the other hand, the Salmonella strains displayed resistance to multiple antibiotics. This alarming situation is further compounded by the fact that all of our strains were obtained from food samples. It highlights the combination of irrational antibiotic usage, inadequate surveillance, and insufficient facilities for detecting multidrug-resistant strains, emphasising the urgency of the issue.
References
Abd-Elghany, S. M., Fathy, T. M., Zakaria, A. I., Imre, K., Morar, A., Herman, V., ... & Sallam, K. I. (2022). Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovars in buffalo meat in Egypt. Foods, 11(18), 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182924.
Adzitey, F., Nsoah, J. K., & Teye, G. A. (2015). Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella species isolated from beef and its related samples in Techiman Municipality of Ghana. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 3(8), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v3i8.644-650.399.
Bertelloni, F., Cagnoli, G., Turchi, B., & Ebani, V. V. (2022). Low level of colistin resistance and mcr genes presence in Salmonella spp.: evaluation of isolates collected between 2000 and 2020 from animals and environment. Antibiotics, 11(2), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020272.
Beshiru, A., Igbinosa, I. H., & Igbinosa, E. O. (2019). Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene elements of Salmonella serovars from ready-to-eat (RTE) shrimps. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 1613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01613.
Cetin, E., Temelli, S., & Eyigor, A. (2020). Nontyphoid Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution and antimicrobial resistance in slaughter sheep. Food science of animal resources, 40(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e75.
Djeffal, S., Mamache, B., Elgroud, R., Hireche, S., & Bouaziz, O. (2018). Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. contamination in broiler chicken farms and slaughterhouses in the northeast of Algeria. Veterinary world, 11(8), 1102. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1102-1108.
Ed-Dra, A., Karraouan, B., El Allaoui, A., Khayatti, M., El Ossmani, H., Filali, F. R., ElMdaghri, N., & Bouchrif, B. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Salmonella Infantis isolated from foods and human samples in Morocco. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 14, 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2018.05.019.
Eguale, T. (2018). Non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars in poultry farms in central Ethiopia: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance. BMC Veterinary Research, 14(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1539-4.
Ekil, R., Adzitey, F., & Huda, N. (2019). Prevalence of resistant Salmonella spp. isolated from raw meat and liver of cattle in the Wa Municipality of Ghana. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 287, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/287/1/012006.
El Hanafi, M., Nourredine, B., Saadia, N., & Hakim, K. (2023). Occurrence of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella serotypes isolated from environment, humans, animals, and animal products in Morocco: A systematic review. World's Veterinary Journal, 1, 32–44. https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj4.
EUCAST. (2023). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 13.1. Accessible via https://www.eucast.org
Fatima, A., Saleem, M., Nawaz, S., Khalid, L., Riaz, S., & Sajid, I. (2023). Prevalence and antibiotics resistance status of Salmonella in raw meat consumed in various areas of Lahore, Pakistan. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 22205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49487-2.
Franco, A., Leekitcharoenphon, P., Feltrin, F., Alba, P., Cordaro, G., Iurescia, M., Tolli, R., D'Incau, M., Staffolani, M., Di Giannatale, E., Hendriksen, R. S., & Battisti, A. (2015). Emergence of a clonal lineage of multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing Salmonella Infantis transmitted from broilers and broiler meat to humans in Italy between 2011 and 2014. PloS one, 10(12), e0144802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144802.
Gutema, F. D., Abdi, R. D., Agga, G. E., Firew, S., Rasschaert, G., Mattheus, W., ... & De Zutter, L. (2021). Assessment of beef carcass contamination with Salmonella and E. coli O 157 in slaughterhouses in Bishoftu, Ethiopia. International Journal of Food Contamination, 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-021-00082-1.
Hassena, A. B., Belmabrouk, S., Amor, M. G. B., Zormati, S., Guermazi-Toumi, S., Siala-Trigui, M., & Gdoura, R. (2022). Study of virulence genes, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic relatedness of foodborne Salmonella isolates from Tunisia. Journal of Food Protection, 85(12), 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-22-167.
Hauser, E., Tietze, E., Helmuth, R., Junker, E., Prager, R., Schroeter, A., Rabsch, W., Fruth, A., Toboldt, A., & Malorny, B. (2012). Clonal dissemination of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis in Germany. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 9(4), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1038.
Karatuğ, N. T., Yüksel, F. N., Akçelik, N., & Akçelik, M. (2018). Genetic diversity of food originated Salmonella isolates. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 32(3), 638-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2018.1451779.
Lima, T., Domingues, S., & Da Silva, G. J. (2019). Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica: a review. Microorganisms, 7(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020055.
Marchant, P., Vivanco, E., Silva, A., Nevermann, J., Fuentes, I., Barrera, B., ... & Fuentes, J. A. (2024). β-lactam-induced OMV release promotes polymyxin tolerance in Salmonella enterica sv. Typhi. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1389663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1389663.
Mezali, L., Mebkhout, F., Nouichi, S., Boudjellaba, S., & Hamdi, T. M. (2019). Serotype diversity and slaughterhouse-level risk factors related to Salmonella contamination on poultry carcasses in Algiers. Journal of infection in developing countries, 13(5), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.10450.
Moawad, A. A., Hotzel, H., Awad, O., Tomaso, H., Neubauer, H., Hafez, H.M., El-Adawy, H. (2017). Occurrence of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in raw chicken and beef meat in northern Egypt and dissemination of their antibiotic resistance markers. Gut Pathogens, 9, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0206-9.
Mouttotou, N., Ahmad, S., Kamran, Z., & Koutoulis, K. C. (2017). Prevalence, risks and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella in poultry production chain. In M. Mares (Ed.), Current Topics in Salmonella and Salmonellosis (pp. 215–234). Intech Open: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5772/67438.
Mustefa, B. A., & Gebremedhin, E. Z. (2018). Carriage and antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella in cattle slaughtered in Ambo municipality abattoir, West Shewa zone, Oromia, Ethiopia - a point prevalence survey. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 22(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v22i2.8.
Mthembu, T. P., Zishiri, O. T., & El Zowalaty, M. E. (2019). Molecular detection of multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolated from livestock production systems in South Africa. Infection and drug resistance, 12, 3537–3548. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S211618.
Nouichi, S., Mezali, L., & Hamdi, T. M. (2022). Distribution of Salmonella virulence factors originated from sheep and cattle in Algerian slaughterhouses. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 73(4), 5013-5020. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.29148.
Nouichi, S., Ouatouat, R., Can, H. Y., Mezali, L., Belkader, C., Ouar-Korichi, M., Bertrand, S., Cantekin, Z., & Hamdi, T. (2018). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from bovine and ovine samples in slaughterhouses of Algiers, Algeria. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 69(1), 863-872. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.16441.
Oueslati, W., Rjeibi, M. R., Benyedem, H., Mamlouk, A., Souissi, F., Selmi, R., & Ettriqui, A. (2021). Prevalence, risk factors, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella in northeast Tunisia broiler flocks. Veterinary Sciences, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9010012.
Pławińska-Czarnak, J., Wódz, K., Kizerwetter-Świda, M., Bogdan, J., Kwieciński, P., Nowak, T., Strzałkowska, Z., & Anusz, K. (2022). Multi-Drug Resistance to Salmonella spp. when isolated from raw meat products. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 11(7), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070876.
Rahmani, M., Peighambari, S. M., Svendsen, C. A., Cavaco, L. M., Agersø, Y., & Hendriksen, R. S. (2013). Molecular clonality and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Infantis from broilers in three Northern regions of Iran. BMC Veterinary Research, 9(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-66.
Rincón-Gamboa, S.M.; Poutou-Piñales, R.A.; Carrascal-Camacho, A.K. Antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoid Salmonella in meat and meat products. 2021. Foods, 10, 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081731.
Sabri, C., Karraouan, B., Berradi, T., Bouchrif, B., El Mellouli, F., Ziyate, N., ... & Taboz, Y. (2023). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Salmonella isolated from food products in the region of Casablanca, Morocco. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 17(3), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.17236.
Sallam, K. I., Mohammed, M. A., Hassan, M. A., & Tamura, T. (2014). Prevalence, molecular identification and antimicrobial resistance profile of Salmonella serovars isolated from retail beef products in Mansoura, Egypt. Food Control, 38, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.027.
Tadesse, A., Sharew, B., Tilahun, M., & Million, Y. (2024). Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Salmonella species from slaughtered cattle carcasses and abattoir personnel at Dessie municipality abattoir, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Microbiology, 24(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03507-x.
Turki, Y., Mehri, I., Fhoula, I., Hassen, A., Ouzari, H. (2014). Comparison of five molecular subtyping methods for differentiation of Salmonella Kentucky isolates in Tunisia. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1414-1.
Velhner, M., Kozoderović, G., Grego, E., Galić, N., Stojanov, I., Jelesić, Z., & Kehrenberg, C. (2014). Clonal spread of Salmonella enterica Serovar Infantis in Serbia: acquisition of mutations in the topoisomerase genes gyrA and parC leads to increased resistance to fluoroquinolones. Zoonoses and Public Health, 61(5), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12081.
Wabeto, W., Abraham, Y., & Anjulo, A. A. (2017). Detection and identification of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella in raw beef at Wolaita Sodo municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 36(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-017-0131-z.