Use of thermography in pigs: relationship between surface and core temperature

Supplementary Files

Figure 1
Figure 2


Animal welfare
Body temperature
Health status
Infrared thermography

How to Cite

Barbieri, S., Talamonti, Z., Nannoni, E., Heinzl, E. U. L., Minero, M., & Canali, E. (2021). Use of thermography in pigs: relationship between surface and core temperature. Veterinaria Italiana, 57(1), 79-82.


This study aims to assess the correlation between surface temperature estimated by infrared thermography and core temperature measured with rectal thermometer in weaning and fattening pigs. A total of 108 pigs were used in this study. Thermal images of the eye of each animal were recorded with a thermal imaging camera, rectal temperatures were measured using a calibrated digital thermometer. The average rectal temperature was 38.9 ± 0.4 °C (MIN = 37.9 °C; MAX = 40.1 °C) and the average eye temperature was 36.7 ± 0.1 °C (MIN = 34.8 °C; MAX = 38.8 °C). Our results showed that the mean eye temperature estimated by infrared thermography was significantly correlated (r = .581, P < .01) with rectal temperature. The correlation was significant and strong for weaners (r = .739, P < .01), significant although weak for fatteners (r = .236 P < .05). Thermography could be a valid method to estimate the core temperature of pigs under farm condition.


Bates J.L., Karriker L.A., Stock M.L., Pertzborn K.M., Balwin L.G., Wulf L.W., Lee C.L., Wang C. & Coetzee J.F. 2014. Impact of transmammary-delivered meloxicam on biomarkers of pain and distress in piglets after castration and tail docking. PLoS ONE, 9(12):e113678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113678.

Chung T., Jung W., Nam E., Kim J., Park S. & Hwang C. 2010. Comparison of Rectal and Infrared Thermometry for Obtaining Body Temperature of Gnotobiotic Piglets in Conventional Portable Germ Free Facility. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 23, 1364-1368.

Church J.S., Hegadoren P.R., Paetkau M.J., Miller C.C., Regev-Shoshani G., Schaefer A.L. & Schwartzkopf-Genswein K.S. 2014. Influence of environmental factors on infrared eye temperature measurements in cattle. Res Vet Sci, 96, 220-226.

Consortium for Parma Ham. 1992. Prosciutto di Parma, Protected Designation of Origin. Specifications and Dossier ( accessed on 5 January 2015).

Dai F., Cogi N.H., Heinzl E.U.L., Dalla Costa E., Canali E. & Minero M. 2015. Validation of a fear test in sport horses using thermography. J Vet Behav, 10, 128-136.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2012a. Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW). EFSA Journal, 10, 2767.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2012b. Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW). EFSA Journal, 10, 2512.

IBM. 2014. IBM SPSS Statistics 22 Command Syntax Reference. IBM Corporation, U.S.A.

Johnson S.R., Rao S., Hussey S.B., Morley P.S. & Traub-Dargatz J.L. 2011. Thermographic Eye Temperature as an Index to Body Temperature in Ponies. J Equine Vet Sci, 31, 63-66.

Kastberger G. & Stachl R. 2003. Infrared imaging technology and biological applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 35, 429-439.

Mason G. & Mendl M. 1993. Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare, 2, 301-319.

Mallick S.P, Zickler T.E., Kriegman D.J. & Belhumeur P.N. 2005. Beyond Lambert: Reconstructing Specular Surfaces Using Color. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), San Diego, CA, USA, 619-626. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.88.

Mitchell M. 2013. Thermal imaging in physiology: Theoretical and practical considerations. In Thermography. Current status and advances in livestock animals and in veterinary medicine (F. Luzi, M. Mitchell, L. Nanni Costa & V. Redaelli, eds.). Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattiche e Zootecniche, Brescia, 47-65.

Schmidt M., Ammon C., Schon P.C., Manteuffel C. & Hoffmann G. 2014. The suitability of infrared temperature measurements for continuous temperature monitoring in gilts. Archiv Tierzucht (Archives Animal Breeding), 21, 1-12.

Schmidt M., Lahrmann K.H. & Ammon C. 2013. Assessment of body temperature in sows by two infrared thermography methods at various body surface locations. J Swine Health Prod, 21, 203-209.

Speakman J.R. & Ward S. 1998. Infrared thermography: principles and applications. Zoology, 101, 224-232.

Stewart M., Webster J.R., Schaefer A.L., Cook N.J. & Scott S.L. 2005. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 14, 319-325.

Stewart M., Schaefer A., Haley D.B, Colyn J., Cook N.J., Stafford K.J. & Webster J.R. 2008. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive method for detecting fear-related responses of cattle to handling procedures. Animal Welfare, 17, 387-393.

Stubsjøen S.M., Flø A.S., Moe R.O., Janczak A.M., Skjerve E., Valle P.S. & Zanella A.J. 2009. Exploring non-invasive methods to assess pain in sheep. Physiol Behav, 98, 640-648.

Tosi M.V., Canali E., Mattiello S., Ferrante V., Carenzi C. & Verga M. 2003. Il benessere dei suini e delle bovine da latte: punti critici e valutazione in allevamento. Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattiche e Zootecniche, Brescia.

Traulsen I., Naunin K., Müller K. & Krieter J. 2010. Application of infrared thermography to measure body temperature of sows. Züchtungskunde, 82, 437-446.