Individual faecal and boot swab sampling to determine John's disease status in small cattle herds
VetIt.1389.7584.2

Supplementary Files

Figure 1
Table I
Figure 2
Table II
Figure 3

Keywords

Boot swab
Cattle
Faecal shedding
Johne’s disease
Mycobacterium aviumsubsp. paratuberculosis

How to Cite

Gschaider, S., Köchler, J., Spergser, J., Tichy, A., Mader, C., Vill, M., Ortner, P., Kössler, J., & Khol, J. L. (2021). Individual faecal and boot swab sampling to determine John’s disease status in small cattle herds. Veterinaria Italiana, 57(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1389.7584.2

Abstract

Individual faecal samples were collected from adult animals in 275 cattle farms previously positive for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). In addition, boot swab samples were collected in 30 randomly chosen farms. Faecal samples were tested for MAP by a combination of bacterial culture and PCR. A logistic regression and the Pearson Correlation were used to calculate the relation between the number of MAP‑positive cows and boot swab results. In 66.9% of all previously tested herds, no positive individual faecal sample was detected, indicating possible fadeout of the infection. In 9 (30.0%) of the 30 selected farms, at least one MAP‑shedding animal was detected in faecal samples individually collected, while only 5 (16.7%) of these farms were found positive when the boot sampling method was used. The sensitivity of the boot swab sampling increased up to 92% (95% CI: 41%‑99%), if at least 12 animals were faecal MAP‑shedders in a herd. The current study shows possible fadeout of JD in a substantial percentage of previously infected herds. Furthermore, in small herds, a relatively high within‑herd prevalence of MAP‑shedding animals is needed to assure reliable positive boot swab results.
https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1389.7584.2
VetIt.1389.7584.2

References

Baumgartner W., Damoser J. & Khol J.L. 2005. Vergleich zweier serologischer Untersuchungen der österreichischen Rinderpopulation zur Verbreitung der bovinen Paratuberkulose (Johne´sche Krankheit) in den Jahren 1995 - 97 und 2002/03 sowie Vorstellung geplanter Bekämpfungsmaßnahmen. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr, 92, 274–277.

Diéguez F.J., González A.M., Menéndez S., Vilar M.J., Sanjuán M.L., Yus E. & Arnaiz I. 2009. Evaluation of four commercial serum ELISAs for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in dairy cows. Vet J, 180, 231-235.

Donat K., Hahn N., Eisenberg T., Schlez K., Köhler H., Wolter W., Rohde M., Pützschel R., Rösler U., Failing K. & Zschöck P.M. 2016. Within-herd prevalence thresholds for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis-positive dairy herds using boot swabs and liquid manure samples. Epidemiol Infect, 144, 413-424.

Donat K., Schau U., Soschinka A. & Köhler H. 2012. Untersuchungen zur Herdenprävalenz von Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) in Rinderbeständen mithilfe serologischer Testverfahren: Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und Kosten. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 125, 361–370.

Eisenberg T., Wolter W., Lenz M., Schlez K. & Zschöck M. 2013. Boot swabs to collect environmental samples from common locations in dairy herds for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) detection. J Dairy Res, 80, 485-489.

Fawzy A., Eisenberg T., El-Sayed A. & Zschöck M. 2015. Improvement of sensitivity for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) detection in bovine faecal samples by specific duplex F57/IC real-time and conventional IS900 PCRs after solid culture enrichment. Trop Anim Health Prod, 47, 721-726.

Fecteau M. & Whitlock R.H. 2011. Treatment and chemoprophylaxis for paratuberculosis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 27, 547-557.

Gilardoni L.R., Paolicchi F.A. & Mundo S.L. 2012. Bovine paratuberculosis: a review of the advantages and disadvantages of different diagnostic tests. Rev Argent Microbiol, 44, 201-215.

Hirst H.L., Garry F.B., Morley P.S., Salman M.D., Dinsmore R.P., Wagner B.A., McSweeney K.D. & Goodell G.M. 2004. Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis infection among dairy cows in Colorado and herd-level risk factors for seropositivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 225, 97-101.

Khol J.L., Damoser J., Dünser J. & Baumgartner W. 2007. Paratuberculosis, a notifiable disease in Austria-current status, compulsory measures and first experiences. Prev Vet Med, 82, 302-307.

Khol J.L., Vill M., Dünser M., Geisbauer E., Tichy A. & Baumgartner W. 2009. Environmental faecal sampling. A new approach in diagnosis and surveillance of paratuberculosis in Austrian cattle herds. Wien Tierärztl Mschr-Vet Med, 96, 279-285.

Köchler J., Gschaider S., Spergser J., Tichy A., Mader C., Vill M., Ortner P., Kössler J. & Khol J.L. 2017. Reproducibility of negative boot swab samples for paratuberculosis in cattle herds in Tyrol (Austria). Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 130, 29-33.

Lombard J.E., Wagner B.A., Smith R.L., McCluskey B.J., Harris B.N., Payeur J.B., Garry F.B. & Salman, M.D. 2006. Evaluation of Environmental Sampling and Culture to Determine Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Distribution and Herd Infection Status on US Dairy Operations. J Dairy Sci, 89, 4163-4171.

Marcé C., Ezanno, P., Seegers H., Pfeiffer D.U. & Fourichon C. 2011. Predicting fadeout versus persistence of paratuberculosis in a dairy cattle herd for management and control purposes: a modelling study. Vet Res, 42, 36.

McKenna S.L.B., Ritter C., Dohoo I., Keefe G.P. & Barkema H.W. 2018. Comparison of fecal pooling strategies for detection of Mycobactereium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in cattle. J Dairy Sci , 101, 7463-7470.

Mitchell R.M., Schukken Y., Koets A., Weber M., Bakker D., Stabel J.R., Whitlock R.H. & Louzoun Y. 2015. Differences in intermittent and continuous faecal shedding patterns between natural and experimental Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infections in cattle. Vet Res, 46, 66.

Moravkova M., Babak V., Kralova A., Pavlik I. & Slana I. 2012. Culture- and Quantitative IS900 Real-Time PCR-Based Analysis of the Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in a Controlled Dairy Cow Farm Environment. J Appl Environ Microbiol, 78, 6608-6614.

Muskens J., Elbers A.R.W., van Weering H.J. & Noordhuizen, J.P.T.M. 2003. Herd Management Practices Associated with Paratuberculosis Seroprevalence in Dutch Dairy Herds. J Vet Med B, 50, 372-377.

Nielsen S.S. & Toft N. 2009. A review of prevalences of paratuberculosis in farmed animals in Europe. Prev Vet Med, 88, 1-14.

Sweeney R.W. 1996. Transmission of paratuberculosis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 12, 305-312.

Sweeney R.W. 2011. Pathogenesis of Paratuberculosis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 27, 537-546.

Sting R., Hrubenja M., Mandl J., Seemann G., Salditt A. & Waibel S. 2014. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in faeces using different procedures of pre-treatment for real-time PCR in comparison to culture. Vet J, 199, 138-42.

Tavornpanich S., Gardner I.A., Anderson R.J., Shin S., Whitlock R.H., Fyock T., Adaska J.M., Walker R.L. & Hietala S.K. 2004. Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled faecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in large dairy herds. Am J Vet Res, 65, 1061-1070.

van Schaik G., Pradenas F.M., Mella N.A. & Kruze V.J. 2007. Diagnostic validity and costs of pooled faecal samples and individual blood or faecal samples to determine the cow- and herd-status for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Prev Vet Med, 82, 159-165.

Whittington R.J. Cultivation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. 2010. In Paratuberculosis: Organism, disease, control (D.M. Collins & M.A. Behr, eds). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, Cambridge, 244-266.

Wolf R., Orsel K., De Buck J., Kanevets U. & Barkema H.W. 2016. Short communication: Evaluation of sampling socks for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis on dairy farms. J Dairy Sci, 99, 2950-2955.

Wolf R., Donat K., Khol J.L., Barkema H.W., Kastelic J. & Wagner P. 2017. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infected cattle herds using environmental samples: a review. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr, 130, 4-12.