Risk prioritization as a tool to Guide Veterinary Public Health activities at the regional level in Italy

Authors

  • Alfonso Zecconi Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Federico Scali Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Luigi Bonizzi Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Nicola Ferrari Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Filippo Ferrero Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Guido Grillo Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Paolo Lanfranchi Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Michele Mortarino Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Vittorio Sala Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Dalila Taloni Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria (DIMEVET), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Piero Frazzi Unità Organizzativa Veterinaria, Regione Lombardia, P.za Città di Lombardia 1, 20124 Milan, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.172.518.2

Keywords:

Public health, Animal diseases, Infectious diseases, Zoonosis, Risk prioritization, Food safety

Abstract

In this study we developed a model for risk prioritisation and characterisation focused on zoonoses and food safety for diseases of interest in veterinary public health at a regional level in Italy. A previous model (Discontools) based on scorecards was used as a basis to develop the new model. A Formalised Consensus Process approach involving academics and veterinary officers was used to develop scorecards and relative form and guidelines. Scorecards include several areas of interest, with different categories and coefficient of importance. The following areas were identified: relevance of the disease, socio-economic impact, impact on public health, impact on trade, impact on animal welfare, control tools. A guide and a form were finalised in order to fill scorecards. Scorecards were filled by consulting available data, literature, and expert opinions. Among bovine diseases, mastitis (Salmonella aureus) showed the highest score; Q fever was the highest among small ruminants; among swine diseases the highest was salmonellosis; while among other animal diseases, toxoplasmosis had the highest score. The approach described in this study is designed to aid professionals in risk prioritisation, decision-making, and to improve disease control systems at a regional level in Italy. It also facilitates risk characterisation in different backgrounds and the identification of data holes in specific areas of interest for the diseases considered. This approach is conceived to aid professionals in risk prioritization, decision-making and to improve disease control systems at a regional level. It also allows to perform risk characterization in different backgrounds and to identify lacks of data in specific areas of interest for the diseases considered.

References

Asao T., Kumeda Y., Kawai T., Shibata T., Oda H., Haruki K., Nakazawa H. & Kozaki S. 2003. An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low‑fat milk in Japan: estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated

milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol Infect, 130, 33‑40.

Baptiste K.E., Williams K., Willams N.J., Wattret A., Clegg P.D., Dawson S., Corkill J.E., O'Neill T. & Hart C.A. 2005. Methicillin‑resistant staphylococci in companion animals. Emerging Infect Dis, 11, 1942‑1944.

Council of the European Union. 2008. Non‑paper on Prioritization of animal related threats and biosecurity. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st09/ st09536‑ad01.en08.pdf.

David M.Z. & Daum R.S. 2010. Community‑associated methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an

emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev, 23, 616‑687.

DISCONTOOLS. 2011a. DISCONTOOLS Scoring Model. http://www.discontools.eu/upl/1/default/doc/1234_PrioV3‑1‑20110303.pdf.

DISCONTOOLS. 2011b. Disease Scoring Model for Prioritisation – Interpretation guide. http://www.discontools.eu/upl/1/default/doc/1233_PrioInterV3‑1‑20110303.pdf.

DISCONTOOLS. 2012. Approaches to the prioritisation of diseases to focus and prioritise research in animal health: a worldwide review of existing methodologies. http://www.discontools.eu/upl/1/default/doc/WP%202%20Prioritisation%20Review%20Paper%20Final%2020120930.docx.

DISCONTOOLS. 2013. Diseases. http://www.discontools.eu/Diseases.EZIPs. 2010. Priority system ver. 1.0. http://ezips.rivm.nl/priority‑system/.

FAO/ WHO Expert Consultation. 1995. Application of risk analysis to food standard issues. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/en/march1995.pdf.

Fedtke I., Gotz F. & Peschel A. 2004. Bacterial evasion of innate host defenses ‑ the Staphylococcus aureus lesson. Int J Med Microbiol, 294, 189‑194.

Foster T.J. 2005. Immune evasion by Staphylococci. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 948‑958.

Graveland H., Duim B., van Duijkeren E., Heederik D. & Wagenaar J.A. 2011. Livestock‑associated methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol, 301, 630‑634.

Grundmann H., Aires‑De‑Sousa M., Boyce J. & Tiemersma E. 2006. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public‑health threat. Lancet, 368, 874‑885.

Haute Autorité de Santé. 2010. Élaboration de recommandations de bonne pratique Méthode: «Recommandations par consensus formalisé».

https://www.has‑sante.fr/portail/jcms/c_272505/fr/recommandations‑par‑consensus‑formalise‑rcf.

Havelaar A.H., Braunig J., Christiansen K., Cornu M., Hald T., Mangen M.J., Molbak K., Pielaat A., Snary E., Van Pelt W., Velthuis A. & Wahlstrom H. 2007. Towards an integrated approach in supporting microbiological food safety decisions. Zoonoses Public Health, 54, 103‑117.

Khanna T., Friendship R., Dewey C. & Weese J.S. 2008. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol, 128, 298‑303.

Le Loir Y., Baron F. & Gautier M. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genetics and molecular research: GMR, 2, 63‑76.

Parker E.M., Jenson I., Jordan D. & Ward M.P. 2012. Development of an algorithm for assessing the risk to food safety posed by a new animal disease. Zoonoses Public Health, 59, 184‑192.

Pieri R. & Pretolani R. 2011. Il sistema agro‑alimentare della Lombardia: rapporto 2010. Milano, Franco Angeli.

Rooijakkers S.H.M., van Kessel K.P.M. & van Strijp J.A.G. 2005. Staphylococcal innate immune evasion. Trends Microbiol, 13, 596‑601.

Schmidt K., Dressel K.M., Niedrig M., Mertens M., Schule S.A. & Groschup M.H. 2013. Public Health and vector‑borne diseases ‑ A new concept for risk governance. Zoonoses Public Health, 60 (8), 528‑538.

Welfare Quality. 2012. The Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols for cattle (sans veal), poultry and pork. http://www.welfarequality.net/everyone.

World Health Organisation (WHO). 2006. Setting priorities in communicable disease surveillance. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications surveillance/WHO_CDS_EPR_LYO_2006_3.pdf.

Zecconi A. & Scali F. 2013. Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in evasion from innate immune defenses in human and animal diseases. Immunol Lett, 150, 12‑22.

Zetola N., Francis J.S., Nuermberger E.L. & Bishai W.R. 2005. Community‑acquired meticillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis, 5, 275‑286.

Published

2019-07-08

How to Cite

Zecconi, A., Scali, F., Bonizzi, L., Ferrari, N., Ferrero, F., Grillo, G., Lanfranchi, P., Mortarino, M., Sala, V., Taloni, D., & Frazzi, P. (2019). Risk prioritization as a tool to Guide Veterinary Public Health activities at the regional level in Italy. Veterinaria Italiana, 55(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.172.518.2

Issue

Topics*

Paper