Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay
PDF

Keywords

Animal welfare
Consumer
Questionnaire
Willingness to pay

How to Cite

Bozzo, G., Barrasso, R., Grimaldi, C. A., Tantillo, G., & Roma, R. (2020). Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay. Veterinaria Italiana, 55(4), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1823.9669.2

Abstract

The interest of European consumers towards animal welfare can be influenced by several variables, both related to the consumers themselves and to the different countries of the EU. In order to assess animal welfare at farm level, it is essential to develop animal-based measures in accordance with the animals’ actual welfare state in terms of their behaviour, health and physiology. The search for valid and reliable indicators is a key objective of several research programs especially for assessing welfare at farm level and the tools may include surveys addressed to farmers. However, there is a need to guarantee financial support for farmers who breed animals in accordance with such welfare conditions, to cover their additional costs. The aim of the study was to investigate the eating habits of Italian consumers regarding meat consumption linked to their knowledge of animal welfare and to their willingness to pay. We investigated consumers’ understanding of animal welfare using a questionnaire (based on a list of twenty-three closed-ended questions) designed for collecting data from large numbers of respondents and multivariate statistical analysis. The data in our study showed that the variable with the greatest influence on purchase price was the place of meat purchase. As regards level of education, it appears that people with a high level of education are more concerned about animal welfare and, consequently, are willing to spend a higher price when buying meat. Consumer attention to the animal-welfare issue is on the rise and, in parallel with this growth, there is also a greater willingness to pay, i.e. a surcharge for the products obtained in the respect of animal welfare. This growth is influenced by the awareness and knowledge of the characteristics of animal welfare.
https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.1823.9669.2
PDF

References

Blokhuis H.J., Jones R.B., Geers R., Miele M. & Veissier I. 2003. Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain. Anim Welf, 12, 445-455.

Blokhuis H.J., Keeling L.J. Gavinelli A. & Serratosa J. 2008. Animal welfare’s impact on the food chain. Trends Food Sci Technol, 19, S75-S83.

Bracke M.B.M., Edwards S., Engel B., Guist W.G. & Algers B. 2008. Expert opinion as ‘validation’ of risk assessment applied to calf welfare. Acta Agric Scand, 50.

Bühl A. 2008. SPSS 18: Introduction into modern data analysis (Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse) (12th ed.). Munich, Germany: Pearson Studium.

Carlsson F., Frykblom P. & Lagerkvist C.J. 2007. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. Eur Rev Agric Econ, 34(3), 321-344.

Carlucci A., Monteleone E., Braghieri A. & Napolitano F. 2009. Mapping the effect of information about animal welfare on consumer liking and willingness to pay for yogurt. J Sens Stud, 24, 712-730.

Clark B., Stewart G.B., Panzone L.A., Kyriazakis I. & Frewer L.J. 2016. A systematic review of public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics, 29, 455-478.

De Greef K., Stafleu F. & De Lauwere C. 2006. A simple value-distinction approach aids transparency in farm animal welfare debates. J Agric Environ Ethics, 19, 57-66. doi:10.1007/s10806-005-4527-1.

De Jonge J. & Van Trijp H.C.M. 2013. Meeting heterogeneity in consumer demand for animal welfare: A reflection of existing knowledge and implication for the meat sector. J Agric Environ Ethics, 26, 629-661. doi:10.1007/s10806-012-9426-7.

Dransfield E., Ngapo T.M., Nielsen N.A., Bredahl L., Sjo¨de´n P.O. Magnusson M., Campo M.M. & Nute G.R. 2005. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Sci, 69, 61-70.

Economic Research Service (ERS) 2004. Calculating the food marketing bill. Amber Waves, February. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service.

European Commission 2005. Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229, Wave 63.2.TNS Opinion and Social. http://ec.europa. eu/public_ opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_229_en.pdf.

European Commission 2007. Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_ 270_en.pdf.

European Commission 2016. Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer442http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/71348.

European Parliament Committees 2017. Animal Welfare in the European Union. Available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses.

Fraser D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet Scand, 50 (Suppl. 1), 1-7. doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1.

Fraser D. 2009. Assessing animal welfare: Different philosophies, different scientific approaches. Zoo Biol, 28, 507-518.

Green T.C. & Mellor D.J. 2011. Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include ‘quality of life’ and related concepts. N Z Vet J, 59(6), 263-271.

Grunert K.G. & Valli C. 2001. Designer-made meat and dairy products: Consumer-led product development. Livest Prod Sci, 72, 83-98.

Heise H., Kemper N. & Theuvsen L. 2015. Veterinarians understanding of farm animal welfare: Results of an empirical study (Was verstehen Tierärzte unter Tierwohl? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung). Tierärztl Umschau, 70, 299-304.

Heise H. & Theuvsen L. 2015. Biological functioning, natural living or welfare quality: investigations of farmers’ understanding of farm animal welfare (Biological functioning, natural living oder welfare quality: Untersuchungen zum Tierwohlverständnis deutscher Landwirte). Ber Landwirtsch, 93, 1-19.

Heise H. & Theuvsen L. 2017. Citizens’ understanding of welfare of animals on the farm: An empirical study. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 21(2), 153-169. doi:10.1080/10888705. 2017.1400439.

Institute of Grocery Distribution (IGD) 1999. The Changing Consumer. Institute of Grocery Distribution, Watford.

Kjørstad I. 2005. Consumer concerns for food animal welfare. In J. Roex, & M. Miele (Eds.), Farm animal welfare concerns - Welfare quality® reports No. 1, pp. 3-80. Uppsala: SLU Service/Reproenheten.

Lagerkvist C.J., Carlsson F. & Viske D. 2006. Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: a choice experiment. J Agrobio Manage Econ, 9(1), 51-58.

Lagerkvist C.J. & Hess S. 2011. A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Eur Rev Agric Econ, 38, 55-78.

Lassen J., Sandoe P. & Forkman B. 2006. Happy pigs are dirty! Conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livest Sci, 103, 221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006. 05.008.

Liljenstolpe C. 2008. Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness, 24 (1), 67-84.

Lusk J.L. & Norwood F.B. 2012. Speciesism, altruism and the economics of animal welfare. Eur Rev Agric Econ, 39 (2), 189-212. doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr015.

Marie M. 2006. Ethics: The new challenge for animal agriculture. Livest Sci, 103, 203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.006.

Meuwissen M.P.M., Van der Lans I.A. & Huirne R.B.M. 2004. A synthesis of consumer behaviour and chain design. In: Dynamics in Chains and Networks (Ed.), Sixth International Conference on Chain and Network Management in Agribusiness and the Food Industry. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Ede, The Netherlands, pp. 310-317.

Miele M., Veissier I., Evans A. & Botreau R. 2011. Animal welfare: Establishing a dialogue between science and society. Anim Welfare, 20, 103-117.

Napolitano F., De Rosa G., Caporale G., Carlucci A., Grasso F. & Monteleone E. 2007. Bridging consumer perception and on-farm assessment of animal welfare. Anim Welfare, 16, 249-253.

Napolitano F., Pacelli C., Girolami A. & Braghieri A. 2008. Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt. J Dairy Sci, 91, 910-917.

Napolitano F., Braghieri A., Piasentier E., Favotto S., Naspetti S. & Zanoli R. 2010. Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay. Food Qual Prefer, 21, 207-212.

Nocella G., Hubbard L. & Scarpa R. 2010. Farm animal welfare, consumer willingness to pay, and trust: Results of a cross-national survey. Appl Econ Perspect P, 32, 275-297.

Nøhr R., Lund T.B., Forkman B. & Sandøe P. 2016. How do Different Kinds of Animal Experts View and Weigh Animal Welfare Indicators? IFRO Report, No. 244; Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen: København, Denmark.

Olesen I., Alfnes F., Røra M.B. & Kolstad K. 2010. Eliciting consumers’ willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livest Sci, 127, 218-226.

Rodenburg T.B., Tuyttens F.A.M., de Reu K., Herman L., Zoons J. & Sonck B. 2008. Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: Assimilating expert opinion. Anim Welfare, 17, 355-361.

Salamano G., Cuccurese A., Poeta A., Santella E., Sechi P., Cambiotti V. & Cenci Goga B.T. 2013. Acceptability of electrical stunning and post-cut stunning among Muslim communities: A possible dialogue. Soc Anim, 21(5), 443-458.

Sassatelli R. 2006. Virtue, Responsibility and Consumer Choice: Framing Critical Consumeris. In J. Brewer and F. Trentmann (eds) Consuming cultures, global perspectives, Berg, Oxford, pp. 219-278.

Schulze B., Spiller A. & Lemke D. 2008. Lucky pig or poor sow? Consumers attitudes towards modern livestock production (Glücksschwein oder arme Sau? Die Einstellung der Verbraucher zur modernen Nutztierhaltung). In A. Spiller & B. Schulze (Eds.), Zukunftsperspektiven der Fleischwirtschaft: Verbraucher, Märkte, Geschäftsbeziehungen (pp. 465-488). Goettingen, Germany: University Publishing.

Swanson J.C. & Mench J.A. 2000. Animal welfare: Consumer viewpoints. http://animal science.ucdavis.edu/Avian/swanson.pdf.

Tuyttens F.A.M., Vanhonacker F., Van Poucke E. & Verbeke W. 2010. Quantitative verification of the correspondence between the welfare quality operational definition of farm animal welfare and the opinion of Flemish farmers, citizens and vegetarians. Livest Sci, 131, 108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.03.008.

Vanhonacker F., Van Poucke E., Tuyttens F. & Verbeke W. 2010. Citizens’ view on farm animal welfare and related information provision: Exploratory insights from Flanders, Belgium. J Agr Environ Ethic, 23, 551-569. doi: 10.1007/s10806-010-9235-9.

Vanhonacker F. & Verbeke W. 2014. Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities. J Agr Environ Ethic, 27, 153-171. doi: 10.1007/s10806-013-9479-2.

Verain M.C., Bartels J., Dagevos H., Sijtsema S.J., Onwezen M.C. & Antonides G. 2012. Segments of sustainable food consumers: A literature review. Int J Consum Stud, 36, 123-132.

Wayne W. D., & Cross C.L. (2013). Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences/Tenth edition. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. ISBN 978-1-118-30279-8 (cloth). Printed in the United States of America.